Brought to you by
ECR 2019 / C-0525
Influence of ROI placement: different ADC metrics on diagnostic accuracy of DWI in NME breast tumours
Congress: ECR 2019
Poster No.: C-0525
Type: Scientific Exhibit
Keywords: Breast, Oncology, Anatomy, MR, MR-Diffusion/Perfusion, MR-Functional imaging, Imaging sequences, Contrast agent-intravenous, Biopsy, Cancer, Neoplasia
Authors: D. B. Avendano1, M. A. Marino2, D. Leithner3, B. Bernard-Davila4, T. H. Helbich5, E. A. Morris6, M. S. Jochelson6, P. A. T. Baltzer5, K. Pinker-Domenig5; 1Monterrey, Nuevo leon/MX, 2Messina/IT, 3Frankfurt/DE, 4New York/US, 5Vienna/AT, 6New York, NY/US


1.         Helbich TH (2000) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 34:208–219

2.         Kuhl C (2007) The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 244:356–378 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442051620

3.         Kuhl CK (2007) Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology 244:672–691 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443051661

4.         Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015

5.         Pinker K, Grabner G, Bogner W, et al (2009) A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Invest Radiol 44:553–558 . doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c127

6.         Kuhl CK (2007) Breast MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 15:315–320, vi . doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.08.003

7.         Baltzer PAT, Kaiser WA, Dietzel M (2015) Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: a multiple reader ROC study. Eur J Radiol 84:86–91 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.023

8.         Benndorf M, Baltzer PAT, Kaiser WA (2011) Assessing the degree of collinearity among the lesion features of the MRI BI-RADS lexicon. Eur J Radiol 80:e322-324 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.030

9.         Marino MA, Clauser P, Woitek R, et al (2015) A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4075-7

10.       Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, et al (2009) BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:994–1000 . doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1983

11.       Baltzer P a. T, Renz DM, Herrmann K-H, et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques. Eur Radiol 19:1612–1620 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1326-5

12.       Marini C, Iacconi C, Giannelli M, et al (2007) Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion. Eur Radiol 17:2646–2655 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0621-2

13.       Guo Y, Cai Y-Q, Cai Z-L, et al (2002) Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 16:172–178 . doi: 10.1002/jmri.10140

14.       Yankeelov TE, Luci JJ, Lepage M, et al (2005) Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 23:519–529 . doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2005.02.013

15.       Dorrius MD, Dijkstra H, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE (2014) Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:2835–2847 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3338-z

16.       Bogner W, Pinker-Domenig K, Bickel H, et al (2012) Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T. Radiology 263:64–76 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111494

17.       Chen X, Li W, Zhang Y, et al (2010) Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC Cancer 10:693 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-693

18.       An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ (2017) Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: Added value of the qualitative analysis of breast lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3.0 T. PloS One 12:e0174681 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174681

19.       Filli L, Ghafoor S, Kenkel D, et al (2016) Simultaneous multi-slice readout-segmented echo planar imaging for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast. Eur J Radiol 85:274–278 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.10.009

20.       Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, et al (2009) Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1716–1722 . doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2139

21.       Pinker K, Moy L, Sutton EJ, et al (2018) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Invest Radiol. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000465

22.       Parsian S, Rahbar H, Allison KH, et al (2012) Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 265:696–706 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112672

23.       Spick C, Pinker-Domenig K, Rudas M, et al (2014) MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies. Eur Radiol 24:1204–1210 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3153-6

24.       Clauser P, Marcon M, Maieron M, et al (2015) Is there a systematic bias of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements of the breast if measured on different workstations? An inter- and intra-reader agreement study. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4051-2

25.       Arponen O, Arponent O, Sudah M, et al (2015) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest. PloS One 10:e0138702 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138702

26.       Lambregts DMJ, Beets GL, Maas M, et al (2011) Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability. Eur Radiol 21:2567–2574 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2220-5

27.       Bickel H, Pinker K, Polanec S, et al (2017) Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values. Eur Radiol 27:1883–1892 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4564-3

28.       Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH, et al (2013) Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 23:1791–1802 . doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2771-8

29.       Pinker K, Bogner W, Baltzer P, et al (2014) Improved diagnostic accuracy with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and 3-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Invest Radiol 49:421–430 . doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000029

30.       Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology 253:341–351 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532081718

31.       Marino MA, Helbich T, Baltzer P, Pinker-Domenig K (2018) Multiparametric MRI of the breast: A review. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 47:301–315 . doi: 10.1002/jmri.25790

32.       Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, et al (2017) Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 16:564–570 . doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8

33.       Pinker K, Marino MA, Dr Meyer-Baese A, Helbich TH (2016) [Multiparametric and molecular imaging of breast tumors with MRI and PET/MRI]. Radiol 56:612–621 . doi: 10.1007/s00117-016-0129-3

34.       Kul S, Eyuboglu I, Cansu A, Alhan E (2014) Diagnostic efficacy of the diffusion weighted imaging in the characterization of different types of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 40:1158–1164 . doi: 10.1002/jmri.24491

35.       Partridge SC, Mullins CD, Kurland BF, et al (2010) Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1664–1673 . doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3534

0 0 1 1247 6860 HSJ 57 16 8091 14.0

36.       Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, et al (2015) Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z

POSTER ACTIONS Add bookmark Contact presenter Send to a friend Download pdf
2 clicks for more privacy: On the first click the button will be activated and you can then share the poster with a second click.

This website uses cookies. Learn more