Brought to you by
ECR 2019 / C-1017
Radiological evaluation of the lumbar lordosis in spine operated patients: is plain film still mandatory?
Congress: ECR 2019
Poster No.: C-1017
Type: Scientific Exhibit
Keywords: Outcomes, Comparative studies, MR, CT, Conventional radiography, Musculoskeletal system, Musculoskeletal spine
Authors: A. Agustí, P. Garcia, I. García Duitama, G. salo bru, J. Ares, A. Solano; Barcelona/ES


Benditz A, Boluki D, Weber M et al. Comparison of Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Radiographs in Standing Position with supine MR Imaging in consideration of the Sacral Slope. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 233 – 239 


Huec J, Roussouly P (2011) Sagittal spino-pelvic balance is a crucial analysis for normal and degenerative spine. Eur Spine J S5:556–557.


Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S (2015) Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop 1:87–95


Samy Bouaicha, Claudia Lamanna, Thorsten Jentzsch, Hans-Peter Simmen, and Clément M. L. Werner, “Comparison of the Sagittal Spine Lordosis by Supine Computed Tomography and Upright Conventional Radiographs in Patients with Spinal Trauma,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 967178, 5 pages.


M. L. Andreasen, L. Langhoff, T. S. Jensen, and H. B. Albert, “Reproduction of the lumbar lordosis: a comparison of standing radiographs versus supine magnetic resonance imaging

obtained with straightened lower extremities,” Journal ofManipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 26–30, 2007.


M. D. Peterson,L.M.Nelson, A. C.McManus, andR.P. Jackson, “The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis: a radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-

90 positions,” Spine, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1419–1424, 1995.


F. Mauch, C. Jung, J. Huth, and G. Bauer, “Changes in the lumbar spine of athletes from supine to the true-standing position in magnetic resonance imaging,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1002–

1007, 2010.


R. T. Morrissy, G. S. Goldsmith, E. C. Hall, D. Kehl, and G. H. Cowie, “Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error,”

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 320–327, 1990.


D. L. Carman, R. H. Browne, and J. G. Birch, “Measurement of scoliosis and lordosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 328–333, 1990.


Chernukha KV, Daffner RH, Reigel DH. Lumbar lordosis measurement. A new method versus Cobb technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:74–9.


Cobb J. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect. 1948;5:261–75.


Hicks GE, George SZ, Nevitt MA, Cauley JA, Vogt MT. Measurement of lumbar lordosis: Inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change and longitudinal variation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:501–6.


Polly DW, Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, Asplund LM, Mulligan M, Chang AS, et al. Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1530–5.


Vacari DA, Neves EB, Ulbricht L. Comparison between methods of assessing lumbosacral curve obtained by radiographic image. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015;23:67–71.


Langensiepen S., Semler O., Sobottke R., Fricke O., Franklin J., Schonau E. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(11):2360–2371. 


Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Hur CY, Song HR, et al. (2010) Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods. Eur Spine J 19: 1551–1557.


Andreasen ML, Langhoff L, Jensen TS, Albert HB (2007) Reproduction of the lumbar lordosis: a comparison of standing radiographs versus supine magnetic resonance imaging obtained with straightened lower extremities. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 30: 26–30. 


Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: Centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 2001;  26:E235-42.


Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith JT, Masters KS, Yandow S. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability

for Cobb angles. Spine 1998;23:551-5.


Ruhinda E, Byanyima RK, Mugerwa H. Reliability and validity of subjective assessment of lumbar lordosis in conventional radiography. East Afr Med J. 2014 Oct;91(10):326-32.


Niemann T, Reisinger C, Ruiz-Lopez L, Bongartz G. Image quality in conventional lumbar spine radiography: evaluation using the post-processing tool Diamond View. Eur J Radiol. 2009 May;70(2):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.040. Epub 2008 Mar 


POSTER ACTIONS Add bookmark Contact presenter Send to a friend Download pdf
2 clicks for more privacy: On the first click the button will be activated and you can then share the poster with a second click.

This website uses cookies. Learn more