Brought to you by
ECR 2018 / C-1595
Can we really call it lithiasis? A young radiologist guide
Congress: ECR 2018
Poster No.: C-1595
Type: Educational Exhibit
Keywords: Pathology, Diagnostic procedure, CT, Genital / Reproductive system male, Abdomen
Authors: C. A. B. Oliveira1, G. Rio2, F. M. F. Gomes3, P. F. R. Oliveira da Silva1; 1Braga/PT, 2Gondomar/PT, 3Vila Nova de Sande/PT
DOI:10.1594/ecr2018/C-1595

References

1.     Bellin MF, Renard-Penna R, Conort P, et al. Hel- ical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analy- sis of CT-attenuation values and density. Eur Ra- diol 2004;14(11):2134–2140.
2.     Kim SC, Burns EK, Lingeman JE, Paterson RF, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr. Cystine calculi: cor- relation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 2007;35(6):319–324.
3.     Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B. Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 1998;159(3):673–675.
4.     Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W. Houns eld unit density in the deter- mination of urinary stone composition. Urology 2001;58(2):170–173.
5.     Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E. Dual source computed tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition. Urology 2008;72 (5):1164–1168.
6.     Dalla Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F. Present- day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol 2001;11(1):4–17.
7.     Ketelslegers E,Van Beers BE. Urinary calculi: im- proved detection and characterization with thin- slice multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 2006;16(1): 161–165.
8.     Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Helbich TH, et al. Unenhanced multidetector row CT in pa- tients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology 2005;235(2):530–536.
9.     Park S, Pearle MS. Imaging for percutaneous re- nal access and management of renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 2006;33(3):353–364.
10. Spencer BA, Wood BJ, Dretler SP. Helical CT and ureteral colic. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27(2): 231–241.
11. Eisner BH, Shaikh M, Uppot RN, Sahani DV, Dretler SP. Genitourinary imaging with noncon- trast computerized tomography: are we missing duplex ureters? J Urol 2008;179(4):1445–1448.
12. Bruce RG, Munch LC, Hoven AD, et al. Uroli- thiasis associated with the protease inhibitor indi- navir. Urology 1997;50(4):513–518.
13. Blake SP, McNicholas MM, Raptopoulos V. Non- opaque crystal deposition causing ureteric obstruc- tion in patients with HIV undergoing indinavir ther- apy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171(3):717–720.
14. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Boridy IC, Takahashi N, Benson GS, Goldman SM. Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis: value of the tissue rim sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168(4):997–1000.
15. Tanrikut C, Sahani D, Dretler SP. Distinguishing stent from stone: use of bone windows. Urology 2004;63(5):823–826; discussion 826–827. 
16. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(1):101–103.
17. Eisner BH, Kambadakone A, Monga M, et al. Computerized tomography magni ed bone win- dows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. J Urol 2009;181(4):1710–1715.
18. Williams JC Jr, Paterson RF, Kopecky KK, Lin- geman JE, McAteer JA. High resolution detection of internal structure of renal calculi by helical computerized tomography. J Urol 2002;167(1): 322–326.
19. Zarse CA, Hameed TA, Jackson ME, et al. CT vis- ible internal stone structure, but not Houns eld unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res 2007;35(4):201–206.
20. Ngo TC, Assimos DG. Uric acid nephrolithiasis: recent progress and future directions. Rev Urol 2007;9(1):17–27.
21. Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J, et al. Stone attenu- ation and skin-to-stone distance on computed to- mography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2008;72(4):765–769.
22. Sheir KZ, Mansour O, Madbouly K, Elsobky E, Abdel-Khalek M. Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spi- ral computerized tomography. Urol Res 2005;33 (2):99–104.
23. Dretler SP. Calculus breakability: fragility and durility. J Endourol 1994;8(1):1–3.
24. Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Chaussy C, Thüroff S. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock- wave lithotripsy: an update. Eur Urol 2001;39(2): 187–199.
25. Renner C, Rassweiler J. Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nephron 1999;81(suppl 1):71–81.
26. Deveci S, Coşkun M, Tekin MI, Peşkircioglu L, Tarhan NC, Ozkardeş H. Spiral computed tomog- raphy: role in determination of chemical composi- tions of pure and mixed urinary stones—an in vitro study. Urology 2004;64(2):237–240.
27. Ramakumar S, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, et al. Prediction of stone composition from plain radio- graphs: a prospective study. J Endourol 1999;13 (6):397–401.
28. da Silva SF, Silva SL, Daher EF, Silva Junior GB, Mota RM, Bruno da Silva CA. Determination of urinary stone composition based on stone mor- phology: a prospective study of 325 consecutive patients in an emerging country. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47(5):561–564.

Normal 0 false false false PT JA X-NONE

 

POSTER ACTIONS Add bookmark Contact presenter Send to a friend Download pdf
SHARE THIS POSTER
2 clicks for more privacy: On the first click the button will be activated and you can then share the poster with a second click.

This website uses cookies. Learn more